LAND ROVER FREELANDER VS SUZUKI VITARA 4X4 BY CLEANMIX

Friday, July 2nd, 2010 at 11:39 am  
Comments (25)

LAND ROVER FREELANDER VS SUZUKI VITARA 4X4 BY CLEANMIX

Related Blogs

Crash Test 1999 – 2005 Suzuki Grand Vitara IIHS Frontal Impa

Monday, June 14th, 2010 at 11:50 am  
Comments (25)

Suzuki Grand Vitara 1999-2005 models results also apply to: 1999-2004 Chevrolet Tracker | 1999-2004 Suzuki VitaraFRONTAL OFFSET TEST OVERALL EVALUATION: Acceptable Structure/safety cage Injury measures Restraints/dummy kinematics Head/neck Chest Leg/foot, left Leg/foot, right Acceptable Acceptable Good Good Good Acceptable Important: Frontal crash test ratings can be compared only among vehicles of similar weight. Test details: The Suzuki Grand Vitara and Suzuki Vitara were introduced in the 1999 model year, and the Chevrolet Tracker was redesigned the same year. Restraints/dummy kinematics — Dummy movement was reasonably well controlled. The driver door bowed outward and, during rebound from the airbag, the dummy moved up and toward the driver door, hitting the roof rail in front of the B-pillar. Injury measures — Measures taken from the neck, chest, and both legs indicate low risk of injuries to these body regions in a crash of this severity. Forces on the head indicate that injuries to the head would be possible. Head acceleration from the roof rail hit was low.

Related Blogs

Crash Test 1999 – 2005 Suzuki Vitara / Chevrolet Tracker (Side Impact) IIHS

Friday, June 4th, 2010 at 10:02 am  
Comments (13)

Suzuki Grand Vitara 1999-2005 models results also apply to: 1999-2004 Chevrolet Tracker | 1999-2004 Suzuki Vitara SIDE IMPACT TEST NO SIDE AIRBAGS AVAILABLEOVERALL EVALUATION: Poor Injury measures Head protection Structure/safety cage Head/neck Torso Pelvis/leg Driver Poor Marginal Acceptable Poor Poor Rear passenger Good Good Good Acceptable Important: Side impact crash test ratings can be compared across vehicle type and weight categories. Test details: The Suzuki Grand Vitara and Suzuki Vitara were introduced in the 1999 model year, and the Chevrolet Tracker was redesigned the same year. Injury measures: Driver — Measures taken from the dummy indicate that serious skull fracture and/or brain injuries would be likely in a crash of this severity. Serious neck injuries as well as rib fractures and a fracture of the pelvis would be possible. In addition, loading to the shoulder was excessive. Rear passenger — Measures taken from the dummy indicate a low risk of any significant injuries in a crash of this severity. Head protection: Driver — The dummy’s head was hit by the intruding barrier, producing high head injury measures. Rear passenger — The dummy’s head was hit by the pillar behind the rear passenger door. This pillar is required by federal standard to provide some protection for occupants’ heads.

Related Blogs

  
Powered by Yahoo! Answers